US contributes $53.3m to UNHCR Ops in Iraq

UNHCR welcomes the generous contribution of USD 53.3 million by the Government of the United States of America (USA) towards UNHCR’s protection and assistance programmes to support vulnerable displaced persons (IDPs) and Syrian refugees in Iraq.

This contribution brings the total USA contribution to UNHCR Iraq in 2021 to USD 88 million. Thus far, the UNHCR operation in Iraq is 35% funded.

There are over 247,000 Syrian refugees and 1.2 million IDPs currently living in Iraq. For these vulnerable families living through protracted displacement under dire living conditions, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic downturn has been remarkably severe.

This timely donation will enable UNHCR to support the refugees and IDPs with life-saving services. The services include, among others, protection interventions covering legal protection and registration services, child protection, the prevention of gender-based violence, and community-based protection, in addition to camp management, education support, and the rehabilitation of infrastructure, schools, and health facilities.

“The U.S. Mission in Iraq is proud of its long-standing support of UNHCR in Iraq. Our contributions to UNHCR reinforce our commitment to the Iraqi people for voluntary, sustainable, long-term solutions for those citizens who suffered under ISIS and now seek to return home and rebuild their lives,” said U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Matthew H. Tueller.

“The tough economic situation had significantly impacted the lives of refugee and IDP families. However, the continuous and reliable support from the USA helps us continue providing life-saving assistance, which can be a lifeline for these families”, said Nicole Epting, UNHCR Representative a.i.

UNHCR is grateful for the generous and long-standing support of the United States to UNHCR globally. This support means that UNHCR can continue to offer protection and pursue durable solutions for internally displaced people and refugees in Iraq.

(Source: UN)

The post US contributes $53.3m to UNHCR Ops in Iraq first appeared on Iraq Business News.

KRG Approves DNO Purchase of Exxon Stake in Baeshiqa

By John Lee.

DNO ASA, the Norwegian oil and gas operator, today announced that the Kurdistan Regional Government has approved the Company’s acquisition of ExxonMobil‘s remaining 32 percent interest in the Baeshiqa license, doubling DNO’s stake.

In parallel, commerciality has been declared on the license with plans submitted for fast-track development including early production from previously drilled but suspended wells.

DNO has already demonstrated proof of concept of producing these wells through temporary test facilities, having trucked some 15,000 barrels of 40 degree API and 22 degree API oil for export in 2019 and 2020 from the Baeshiqa-2 and Zartik-1 discovery wells.

Following the transaction, the joint venture comprises DNO as operator with a 64 percent (80 percent paying) interest, the Turkish Energy Company (TEC) with a 16 percent (20 percent paying) interest and the Kurdistan Regional Government with a 20 percent carried interest.

Bijan Mossavar-Rahmani, DNO’s Executive Chairman, said:

This acquisition and plans for fast-track development underscore our belief in the potential of the Baeshiqa license and more broadly our long-term commitment to Kurdistan.

“Once we get the green light from the authorities to proceed, first production will be a matter of months rather than years.

DNO’s 3,204 meters discovery well, Baeshiqa-2, tested hydrocarbons to surface from multiple stacked Jurassic and Triassic zones. Two zones flowed naturally at rates averaging over 3,000 barrels of oil per day (bopd) of light gravity oil each and another averaged over 1,000 bopd also of light gravity oil. DNO drilled Zartik-1, the second discovery well, 16 kilometers to the southeast of Baeshiqa-2, to a depth of 3,021 meters. This well tested hydrocarbons to surface from several Jurassic zones, with one zone flowing naturally at rates averaging 2,000 bopd of medium gravity oil.

DNO acquired its first 32 percent interest and assumed operatorship of the Baeshiqa license from ExxonMobil in 2018. As consideration for both acquisitions DNO has covered ExxonMobil’s share of exploration costs since January 2019 and the seller will receive payment of USD 15 million.

In addition to the 327-square kilometer Baeshiqa license, DNO operates the Tawke license containing the Tawke and Peshkabir fields in Kurdistan. Combined production from these fields averaged 110,300 bopd in the second quarter of 2021.

(Source: DNO)

The post KRG Approves DNO Purchase of Exxon Stake in Baeshiqa first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Genel Energy Increases Dividend

By John Lee.

Genel Energy has increased its interim dividend, announced in its unaudited results for the six months ended 30 June 2021:

Bill Higgs, Chief Executive of Genel, said:

Genel continues to deliver on its strategy and demonstrate the merits of its business model. Capital investment made last year, despite the low oil price and over $150 million of deferred payments, has meant this period has benefitted from the addition of oil from Sarta and increased production from Peshkabir, with production having increased in line with guidance.

“This high-margin production will generate sufficient cash flow in 2021 to more than cover investment in growth and the increased dividend, and we are set to end the year in a net cash position.

“Our appraisal campaign at our exciting growth assets Sarta and Qara Dagh is now well underway, and we look forward to the results of three of these high-potential wells later this year. Given the cash generation of the business, our strong balance sheet, and the resilience of our business model, we are fulfilling our aim of paying a progressive dividend by increasing the interim payment.

Results summary ($ million unless stated)

H1 2021 H1 2020 FY 2020
Average Brent oil price ($/bbl) 65 40 42
Production (bopd, working interest)  32,760 32,100  31,980
Revenue  151.5 88.4  159.7
EBITDAX1  123.1 65.1  114.6
  Depreciation and amortisation  (81.8) (82.6)  (153.7)
  Exploration expense (1.3) (2.2)
  Impairment of oil and gas assets (286.3) (286.3)
  Impairment of receivables (34.9) (36.9)
Operating profit / (loss) 41.3 (340.0) (364.5)
Cash flow from operating activities 91.1 85.5 129.4
Capital expenditure 58.2 58.5 109.7
Free cash flow2 22.2 6.5 (4.4)
Cash 266.4 355.3 354.5
Total debt 280.0 300.0 280.0
Net (debt) / cash3 (2.2) 57.2 6.2
Basic EPS (¢ per share) 9.3 (128.9) (152.0)
Dividends declared for the period (¢ per share) 6 5 15
  1. EBITDAX is operating profit / (loss) adjusted for the add back of depreciation and amortisation, exploration expense, impairment of property, plant and equipment, impairment of intangible assets and impairment of receivables
  2. Free cash flow is reconciled on page 10
  3. Reported cash less IFRS debt (page 11)

Highlights

  • Strong cash generation from low-cost oil production:
    • Net production averaged 32,760 bopd in H1 2021, slightly above the average in the prior year and in line with guidance (H1 2020: 32,100 bopd)
    • Low production cost of $3.7/bbl, oil price increase, and restart of the override helped deliver an overall margin from our production assets of $111 million
    • Free cash flow for the period was $22 million, despite the Kurdistan Regional Government (‘KRG’) changing its payment schedule from one to two months in arrears, moving c.$30 million that was due in H1 into July
    • $123 million of cash proceeds were received in H1 2021 (H1 2020: $110 million)
  • Investing in growth:
    • Our high-potential drilling campaign is well underway, with the QD-2 well at Qara Dagh having spud in April, and the Sarta-5 well in June
    • $58 million of capital expenditure in H1 2021, with activity accelerating in H2
  • Financial strength to underpin a material and progressive dividend:
    • Cash of $266 million, with net debt of $2.2 million
    • Due to the rise in the oil price boosting expected cash generation, and Management’s confidence in Genel’s future prospects, interim dividend increased to 6¢ per share (H1 2020: 5¢ per share)
  • A socially responsible contributor to the global energy mix:
    • Zero lost time injuries (‘LTI’) and zero tier one loss of primary containment (‘LOPC’) events at Genel and TTOPCO operations. Now no LTIs since 2015, with over 14 million work hours since the last incident, and no LOPCs since 2017
    • Second GRI compliant Sustainability Report issued today

Outlook

  • Production guidance for 2021 of slightly above the 2020 average of 31,980 bopd maintained
  • 2021 capital expenditure guidance maintained at $150 million to $200 million, with the expectation that expenditure will now be around the middle of this range, following delays in approvals from the KRG and ongoing challenges relating to COVID-19 causing some planned activity to move to Q1 2022
  • High-impact appraisal results to come in 2021:
    • Results from the QD-2 and Sarta-5 wells are expected around the end of Q3 2021
    • The Sarta-1D well is set to spud in coming days
    • Sarta-6 well is scheduled to get underway immediately following the completion of drilling at Sarta-5
  • Genel expects to generate free cash flow in 2021 and end the year in a net cash position, despite material investment in growth

More here.

(Source: Genel Energy)

The post Genel Energy Increases Dividend first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Amid Iranian Gas Shortage, Iraq searches for Alternatives

By Adnan Abu Zeed for Al Monitor. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Iraq Business News.

Amid Iranian gas shortage, Iraq searches for alternatives

Iran’s dilapidated gas infrastructure has limited its transfers to Iraq, adding to Iraq’s own energy crisis.

Click here to read the full story.

The post Amid Iranian Gas Shortage, Iraq searches for Alternatives first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Iraqi Oil Exports for July Exceeded $6.5bn

By John Lee.

Iraq’s Ministry of Oil has announced preliminary oil exports for July of 90,467,794 barrels, giving an average for the month of 2,918 million barrels per day (bpd), slightly up from the 2.892 million bpd exported in June.

The exports from the oilfields in central and southern Iraq amounted to approximately 87,455,359 barrels, while exports from Kirkuk amounted to 3,012,435 barrels.

Revenues for the month were $6.513 billion at an average price of $72.001 per barrel.

June’s export figures can be found here.

(Source: Ministry of Oil)

The post Iraqi Oil Exports for July Exceeded $6.5bn first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Analyzing and Understanding Petroleum Fiscal Systems

By Ahmed Mousa Jiyad.

Any opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Iraq Business News.

ORCID identifier is: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0946-9898

Upstream petroleum (Oil, Gas and Condensates) sector occupies very critical position and, accordingly, has influential impacts on the national economies of Iraq, some Middle East and North America- MENA countries, as well as many other developing countries that are endowed with such natural resources.

This importance is manifested through many significant economic parameters at macro-economy level, including balance of payments, trade balance, State budget (covering both investment and recurrent allocations), current account, it’s share in GDP among others. Foreign exchange and revenues generated through this sector are the main fiscal determinants for financing socio-economic development plans.

Moreover, ownership of petroleum resources is, mostly, vested to the people through legal instruments such as constitutions.

The development of petroleum resources requires, in most cases, different forms of cooperation with and the  involvement of the international oil companies-IOCs through variety of  legal means and instruments such as contracts, agreements, memoranda of cooperation or understanding, protocols and alike. The involvement of IOCs (regardless of their ‘home country’ and associated geostrategic and geopolitical implications) is thus regulated and, accordingly, impacted by different components of the “Fiscal System” that are highlighted in or premised on many host-country national laws, regulations, directives among others and then translated into specific provisions, i.e., articles, and inserted into and comprised in these binding documents, mostly named contracts or agreements, with an IOC or a consortium of IOCs.

Analysing and professionally understanding upstream petroleum fiscal systems is a prerequisite qualification for all those who are involved directly in the development of petroleum resources in any country, particularly the related authorities and entities. Also, the comparative assessments of different fiscal systems is critically vital for national decision makers to be conversant with prior to deciding which system and what components of that system serve better their national aspirations in developing the upstream petroleum.

As a matter of practical and implementation purpose, understanding upstream petroleum fiscal system, of a concluded contract or agreement, is not and should not be confined only to those who are involved directly; reasonable familiarity with the components of the fiscal system of the concluded contracts is surely needed for many more others of officials at different branches of government as well as experts, research and consulting centres, academics, media, civil society organisation, economists, petroleum professionals and political leaders among others.

There is a wide range of reference books, publications, models and specialised consulting firms alike that cover variety of upstream petroleum fiscal regimes used in the global upstream petroleum industry.

Among the most important and relevant references is the book reviewed here.*

This is an excellent book, well written, carefully structured, articulate in debating the issues objectively- pros and cons, and follows good and constant methodology for each chapter; it is, therefore, a valuable addition to the library and knowledge of petroleum resource development and helps in formulating prudent management of these natural resources.

The book comprises three parts (not four, p. 13) and between them they have a combined total of sixteen chapters, in addition to Glossary and Bibliography. Part one, the shortest among the three and includes the first two chapters, presents the topics for the book, explains some terminology used, introduces fiscal systems in terms of what functions they have, their different forms and the process of licensing petroleum and outlines the structure of the book.

This part refers to the distinctions that sometimes made regarding the categories of fiscal systems such as concessionary, royalty/tax and contract-based systems and reviews four broad alternatives forms of petroleum licensing; these are:  Concessions (also called leases, licenses or extraction permits); Production sharing agreements/ contracts-PSA/C; Service agreements/ contracts  (including risk service contracts) and other agreements/contracts (mostly tax-based).

The second part addresses various Fiscal Instruments, i.e., the core and main pillars of petroleum fiscal system, and has chapters 3 to and including chapter 11.

Each chapter follows the same methodology: it begins with Definition and purpose, followed by thorough review and elaborated discussion of the topics covered in that chapter, a summary and ends with notes. The nine chapters of this part provide insights on and cover all important fiscal instruments by different governing modalities in upstream petroleum contracts and agreements. Fiscal instruments and issues covered in this part include: Levy on production (Royalty, severance tax, and revenue sharing); Production sharing; Remuneration for service;  Bonuses, lease sales and area fees; Privileged state participation; Tax on corporate income and distributed profits; Petroleum resource taxes; Taxes related to inputs and externalities; Business obligations in the national interests.

A significant and very helpful sub-section on the “Economic characteristics….” of the above mentioned instruments enriches the quality and usefulness of the book and expands the debates around these fiscal instruments. Also, this part addresses, rather eloquently and at length, with quantitative comparative analysis four main “trigger parameters” for “sharing of profit petroleum” or for fee payment that are in use in different contracts.

By this way the authors facilitate the understanding of the applications of these trigger parameters in the latter chapters of part three. These four triggers are: Rate of Return (ROR); R-Factor; Daily Rate of Production (DROP) and Cumulative Production (CP).

Examples on related contractual provisions drawn from many different countries are used or referred to throughout this part.

This part of the book is a must-read for those involved in upstream petroleum development through involving IOCs in such development, particularly professionals, ministry officials, legislating authorities and executive decision makers among others.

The third part focuses on Applications and comprises chapters 13 to 16. It aims at providing integrated perspective on the implication and implementation of the fiscal systems and their instruments. It begins with issues relating to fiscal valuation, particularly those connected to international tax issues then addresses some economic characteristics of petroleum operations and links fiscal analysis to some important economic features of the business.

Important feature of this part is the review of computer modelling, providing helpful insights on some available models, and uses its own fiscal model, Petrosharing, which was developed to support the analysis in this book. The last chapter proposes a step-by-step framework or a roadmap to design petroleum fiscal system, premised on the fiscal instruments that are discussed throughout the book.

This part presents many charts, uses simulations and modeling, and discuses thoroughly critical issues and development scenarios using data drawn from, mostly, Norwegian upstream fields.

The Glossary lists explanation of the main terms and concepts mentioned in the book and the book has Bibliography but has no Index, brief bios and photos of the authors are provided twice.

The authors’ academic and professional backgrounds, an economist and legal profession, stand probably behind the impressive quality of this unique book as manifested by the depth and objectivity when analysing various economic and legal matters.

The book helps, to a great extent, in making a clear distinction between petroleum fiscal systems (and their different instruments on one side) and other macro-economy issues such as revenue management, oil policy and national development plans or programmes (on the other) to mention a few. Issues that are, more often than not, mixed up by commentators and result in confusion, unnecessarily, and spread inaccurate interpretation (this is much evidenced through debating such issues in Iraq over the last ten years). A contract relates to a specific oilfield project falls within the sphere of micro-economics analysis, while oil policy or revenue management and utilization and national development are of macro-economic nature. But surely, many fiscal instruments (such as taxation, state partner share, type of contract among others) are of macro-nationwide applications and implications, and thus, have direct bearings on upstream petroleum projects. Hence, there are dual attributions of or organic linkages between three levels of analysis; micro, sector-wide and macro level, which entails very careful and proper understanding and distinction.

The essence of and why there is petroleum fiscal systems, according to the authors, is sharing the resource rent between the host country and the resource firms, i.e., IOCs. But, the book asserts, “Calculating the resource rent is not straightforward, and is rarely done explicitly. It is an economic term discussed on a conceptual level, seldom found in Excel spreadsheets.” (P. 4) and “rarely calculated as a precise value.” (P. 457). Yet, there are, throughout the book, numerous examples on “resource rent tax” that are applied by many countries and jurisdictions. When a tax, which is important and significant petroleum fiscal instrument, is premised on or justified by the resource rent, then it is an empirical and material manifestation of a quantified/ quantifiable resource rent. Moreover, the “Project economics” spreadsheet (Excel or others) comprises a “precise value” of the resource rent tax as highlighted in Table 14.2, (P. 348). Is there some inconsistency here!

There is a strong link between resource rent and sovereignty, particularly in most developing countries. But the book refers twice to sovereignty: with regards to “Stabilization clauses” (P. 43) and a citation on the, “[R]enewed interest in such [risk service] agreements since the 1990s, largely due to national concerns with sovereignty over their petroleum.” (P. 125).  The book, surprisingly, did not discuss or highlight the issue of state permanent sovereignty over its natural (in this case) petroleum, which is significant nation’s right issue and has been recognized under international law for decades.[1]

Also, there is a sense of generalization in considering sharing resource rent between host country and the resource firms under all petroleum fiscal systems, but this is not necessarily the case. If “remuneration fee” is included in production cost, as it should be, then the whole resource rent is acquired by the host country under service contracts, such as the one adopted by Iraq’ federal ministry of oil, and this is vital feature of this type of petroleum fiscal system.

The issue of “gold plating”, the tendency that the contractor will be economically motivated to spend money unnecessarily,(P. 134) and thus “benefitting,…, due to distortions caused by the fiscal regime, (p. 405), attracted good attention by the authors, as evidenced by the frequency of the term in the book. It was discussed, at depth using its Petrosharing Model, with respect to “Saving index” (Pp. 380-90), with regards to the issue of “Neutrality” of fiscal system (Pp. 393-405 ) and with regard to Iraq, among others.

When it comes to service contracts adopted by Iraq, the book focus on “gold plating” relies on two references relating to Rumaila oilfield: Ghandi and Lin Lowell (2016) (p. 134) and Van Meurs (2009) (p. 136). Both studies give the impression that “gold plating” is peculiar to and intrinsic of service contracts; it is not. Moreover, both studies seems to premise their analysis on a “draft” model contract not on a “signed” contract; Rumaila is a brown oilfield that has been producing since mid-1950s and, thus, it is unreasonable to offer its re-habilitation under production sharing contract, as suggested by the two studies; the authors of the two studies seemed unaware of the measure to combat “gold plating” that were introduced in service contracts for the second bid round, due to a learning-curve, and finally, economic efficiency and cost effectiveness are, practically, impacted by both the “text” of the contract and the “monitoring and management” of the contact through various decision-making chain from the bottom at the field’ joint management committee up to Energy Committee at the Council of Ministers.

That said, there are growing number of high profiled cases indicating to serious fraud and corruption in the Iraqi petroleum upstream projects, the impact of which could very well dwarf “gold plating” effects associated with Service contracts. Similarly, corruption in the KRG’ production sharing contracts has been even more detrimental.

This brings to the discussion the importance and impacts of vital political economy factors and geopolitical considerations on these projects, since petroleum fiscal system is formulated upon or functions within the environment dictated by these factors and considerations.

The book uses the term “resource firms” instead of the widely used term IOCs; the authors’ argument for adopting this term are not very convincing (Pp. 6/7) and they only add one more term to the existing ones: IOCs, Oil Majors; Big Oil; transnationals; multinationals.

Also the book mentions Middle East Gulf-MEG (P. 308; P. 416), probably referring to the known Arabian Gulf or Persian Gulf (depending where one stands) but hardly MEG!!

A few typing errors and sometimes numbers do not add up corresponding to what the narratives lead to; this could be due to either typing errors or to rounding effects. Some charts, particularly in part three are not clear due to scanning.

To sum up, this is invaluable highly informative and thus recommended book for oil professionals, contracts formulation and negotiation, and for authorities entrusted with upstream petroleum development. Moreover, from my own experience, this book is excellent source for designing and delivering human capacity development activities such as workshops and training on petroleum fiscal systems.

 

* Petroleum Fiscal Systems,

Erik T. Jarlsby and Eduardo G. Pereira (2019)

Publisher: PennWell Corporation. Oklahoma, USA,

ISBN: 978-1-59370-480-3 (hbc); 471 pages

Price: $101.15

 

My edited review article of the above book was published on:  Journal of Contemporary Iraq & the Arab World, Volume 14, Number 3, 1 September 2020, pp. 261-265(5)

[1] Brownlie, Ian (1995), Basic Documents in International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 4th Edition, Part Five.

 

Mr Jiyad is an independent development consultant, scholar and Associate with the former Centre for Global Energy Studies (CGES), London. He was formerly a senior economist with the Iraq National Oil Company and Iraq’s Ministry of Oil, Chief Expert for the Council of Ministers, Director at the Ministry of Trade, and International Specialist with UN organizations in Uganda, Sudan and Jordan. He is now based in Norway (Email: mou-jiya(at)online.no, Skype ID: Ahmed Mousa Jiyad). Read more of Mr Jiyad’s biography here.

The post Analyzing and Understanding Petroleum Fiscal Systems first appeared on Iraq Business News.

KRG Bureaucracy Delays DNO Investment

DNO ASA, the Norwegian oil and gas operator, has reported operating profit of USD 61 million in the quarter ending 30 June 2021, its second consecutive profitable quarter since the onset of the COVID pandemic. Revenues totaled USD 184 million, up USD 14 million from the previous quarter, as higher oil and gas prices more than compensated for lower North Sea volumes sold.

Gross operated production at the Company’s flagship Tawke license in Kurdistan averaged 110,300 barrels of oil per day (bopd) in the second quarter, of which the Peshkabir field contributed 63,000 bopd and the Tawke field 47,300 bopd. Of the total, 82,700 bopd were net to DNO’s interest during the quarter.

DNO’s North Sea net production dropped to 9,900 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd) in the second quarter, primarily due to planned summer maintenance shutdowns at Marulk and Alve and infill drilling at Ula and Tambar. The Company expects the North Sea contribution to average 13,000 boepd for the year.

In the wake of an ongoing reorganization of Kurdistan’s Ministry of Natural Resources, the Company has experienced extended delays to the final approval of its 2021 Tawke field work program and budget as well as to the approvals necessary to fast track early production from the Baeshiqa license. The delays are expected to defer USD 50 million in 2021 DNO net spending in Kurdistan which could have generated up to 15,000 bopd gross production across DNO’s three operated fields (Tawke, Peshkabir and Baeshiqa) going into 2022.

With no new wells coming on production at the Tawke field in more than a year, the natural production decline has been partially offset by pressure support from reinjection of over 20 million cubic feet of gas per day from the Peshkabir field in addition to workovers and interventions of existing wells.

“We are eager to invest and produce more oil in Kurdistan,” said DNO’s executive chairman Bijan Mossavar-Rahmani. “In nearly two decades of operations in Kurdistan, DNO has confronted and overcome multiple challenges and we are well positioned to continue to do so,” he added.

In the North Sea, DNO maintains an active drilling program in 2021, including two appraisal wells on previous discoveries and three exploration wells, the first of which has been drilled leading to a discovery. In addition, the Company plans 10 development wells this year.

Recently, the DNO-operated Brasse project selected the Equinor-operated Oseberg facilities as the preferred development host. With total field reserves of 35 million boe and a relatively modest topside construction scope on Oseberg, Brasse has robust project economics based on a 2022 project sanction target.

With an operational cash flow of USD 160 million, an increase of 135 percent from the first quarter, the Company reduced its bond debt to USD 700 million through a USD 100 million partial bond redemption. DNO exited the quarter with a net interest-bearing debt of USD 396 million, the lowest level since yearend 2018.

DNO received USD 159 million in the second quarter from Kurdistan, up from USD 75 million in the first quarter of 2021. Additional payments this week bring the total 2021 receipts from Kurdistan to USD 290 million year-to-date. The arrears built up as a result of Kurdistan’s withholding of payment of certain invoices to DNO in 2019 and 2020 total USD 214 million, excluding any interest.

(Source: DNO)

The post KRG Bureaucracy Delays DNO Investment first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Iraq and Lebanon sign Fuel Barter Deal

By John Lee.

Iraq and Lebanon have finalised an agreement under which Iraq will provide the Lebanese Electricity Corporation with 1 million tonnes of heavy fuel oil over a one-year period.

Lebanon’s caretaker Energy Minister, Raymond Ghajar, signed the deal in Baghdad at the weekend.

The oil will be paid for in goods and services.

(Sources: Govt of Iraq, NNA)

The post Iraq and Lebanon sign Fuel Barter Deal first appeared on Iraq Business News.

Kadhimi “wants US Firm to replace Exxon” at West Qurna 1

By John Lee.

According to a report from Reuters, the Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi has told the press in Washington DC that he wants another American company to replace ExxonMobil when it exits the West Qurna 1 oilfield.

Meanwhile, S&P Global Platts reports that Exxon filed an arbitration case against the state-owned Basra Oil Company (BOC) related to its stalled attempt to sell its stake in the field.

More here and here.

Read also: The Demise of ExxonMobil in the Iraqi Petroleum Sector 

(Sources: Reuters, S&P Global Platts)

The post Kadhimi “wants US Firm to replace Exxon” at West Qurna 1 first appeared on Iraq Business News.